Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Note

This is a template that should be used to document each feature. It’s meant to be easy, not prescriptive - change it at will!

Table of contents

Table of Contents

Definition

Status

Status
titleNOT STARTED

RBIberia Owner

@paula winter

RBI Owner

Designer

Schroer, Gabriel

❓ Open questions

Info

We need to constantly make this section empty.

Having information such as:

  • The scenario and its priority among other scenarios

  • What is currently available in the plaftorm

  • What's not available in the platform to fulfill the use case

Requirements

Problem statement

Increase sales in the Menu page through a correct proposition of complementary products. The existing behaviour, Complete your menu, should be designed to push the addition of extra items in the cart.

Acceptance criteria

Scope of this effort is exclusively on the Menu section, not check-out.

UX

  1. Showing to the customer all the available options that can be added in an easy and quick way

  2. The customer has the possibility to change quantity of the same add-on.

SETUP - SANITY

  1. Configure options per different sales channels (home delivery and mobile ordering). Ex: Currently at BK ES we have a full price menu in HD and a reduced price menu in MO (eat in, takeaway, etc).

    1. Price

    2. Product

  2. Providing the possibility to setup just for specific categories (CBK, starters, desserts, etc)

  3. The products chosen can be at full price or reduced cost.

  4. It must be possible to configure the maximum number of add-ons added to each menu (either the same add-on or different add-ons). Example: configuration of maximum 3 add-ons, the customer could choose 3 of the same or 3 different add-ons.

  5. The configuration of the limit must be per sales channel (HD and MO).

Success metrics

Number of transactions with extra products

🤔 Assumptions

Solution

Scenarios

Info

Note: these are high-level scenarios that must pass testing before we can release the feature. They should also be used to drive design. Note that we do not specify user interface details in these steps - that is deliberate so that we focus on the process and not on the UI since the UI can change throughout design and development.

Scenario 1: xxx

Expect that

Steps

Expected results

Do this

PROs

CONs

Complete your menu

Following the flow of the customization menu

Not attractive

Setup force the choise between “no products shown” and “including an item”

Carrousel

Visibility

Limitation in terms of price

Design

Figma design here: [insert link]

image-20240104-180513.png

Combo slot today provides the possibility to setup min and max amount

Development

Release

Let's start differentiating the upselling proposal between Menu and Checkout as the needs are different. 

The scope today was the Menu part.

  1. The main identified need is to improve the UI to make it more attractive

  • it's important to induce the user to look at the extra options

  • make it visible with images of the product

  • giving the possibility to add/reduce the items

  1. From a setup perspective, the need is to differentiate (in order)

  • by channel, giving the possibility to customize products and prices

  • by menu/category itself (ex: menus, drinks, starters)

  • flexibility on the order of each product -> in this way it will be possible to test different orders (A/B testings by attractivity and rentability)

  • providing the possibility to setup a min and maximum number of each specific item

  • providing the possibility to limit number of items to be added 

Giving that in mind, we are aware that there are more potential improvements that could be tackled in the future to make the upselling more intelligent. 

Let me know if you have any questions or I missed something,

Thanks