Status

RBIberia Owner

Paula Winter

RBI Owner

Ruani, Andrea

DMP/DOP owner

Klein, Simon (Deactivated) Bastos de Macedo, Gustavo

Designer

Schroer, Gabriel (Deactivated) Hainzenreder, Diego

Other SMEs

Pierzynski, Augusto (Deactivated)

IREQ ticket

https://rbictg.atlassian.net/jira/servicedesk/projects/IREQ/issue/IREQ-1109

Problem statement (generic)

Delivery fee is considered a critical aspect on the competition with 3rd party players. The evolution during the last years has brought the industry to structure the delivery cost in a more granular way to optimize efficiency and enhance competitiveness.

This includes dissecting the delivery process to identify specific costs such as the drivers and their allocations, implementing advanced route optimization algorithms, and considering a different number of factors that are impacting the delivery itself.

As a result, RBI can minimize expenses and ultimately offer more competitive delivery fees connected with a better transparency.

Fees definition

Delivery Fee: The basic cost to provide a delivery service. It has several possibilities and factors that can impact the calculation.

Service Fee (or Managment Fee): It includes several variables can be included in this macro fee. Examples are: payment method, tier loyalty, company priorities, etc.

The scope of this discovery is to work exclusively on the Service Fee

Problem statement (Iberia)

Looking at the /wiki/spaces/IN/pages/3863838850 document, there are a few concerns:

a) Basket size

In the actual formula, the basket size has a progressive discount mechanism.

In the Iberia markets, where the Average Check is BK ES 12.10€, BK PT 10.18€, PLK ES 14.83€, the high delivery fee (4.99€) for the purchase <10€ and the lack of a specific cost section for small basket size brings to show an extremely expensive delivery fee without providing the right information.

Considering the small basket size a variable and not a discount will help to explain better the cost structure of the fee

b) Free delivery fee

Connected to the previous point, there is the fact that splitting the cost of the delivery fee and basket size can facilitate the marketing strategy of offering free delivery fee - a key competitive advantage. Considering the Average Check and the fact that the free delivery fee is a strategic marketing action (campaigns, partnerships), having a lower base delivery fee (ex: 1.99€) and having the basket size cost splitted, could allow the company to push for a “free delivery fee” strategy without impacting the financial part of the company.

Analyzing at the actual solution, we could find an easy workaround without generating impact

c) Connecting PLUs

Today is missing a relationship with a PLU that will facilitate the analysis and the job of the accountants on the new delivery fee structure (see example below). Generating a specific PLU for both fees (delivery and management) could be a good approach.

d) Other fees to be considered (IMPROVEMENTS)

Today the delivery cost calculation is not taking into account other critical aspects of the delivery and management process that are impacting negatively the logistic and financial part of the delivery.

More informations here: https://www.figma.com/file/Bp8vIQlnoJMLyONqVQ4ACG/2023---Q4---%5BIBFEC-1137%5D---Dynamic-delivery-fees?type=whiteboard&node-id=0%3A1&t=rku4BIAcK07yt1pF-1

Success Metrics

  1. Average check increase (primary KPI)

  2. Conversion from cart > payment

  3. Conversion from cart > purchase

Acceptance Criteria

The new Service Fee will operate for Home delivery in app, web, call center and aggregators (with differentiated costs)

Solution

There should be an additional fee to be shown, indipendently from the potential other ones existing.

IMPORTANT to mention that there is always a relation between the Delivery Fee and the Service Fee: for each basket size level there is a specific delivery fee and service fee

a) LaunchDarkly

b) Sanity

b) Ops Portal

image-20240126-123913.png

IMPORTANT to understand the data flow as it could be that this development will be out of our scope, in case Homeria is the generator of the fee → Need to be validated

Design

Front End - link here

Configuration - link here

DMP - link here

Call Center - link here

Data on % of orders within each average check bucket:

  1. I’m grouping into 3 buckets according to what I saw in the figma file: orders < 10 EUR, 10 EUR < orders < 16 EUR and orders > 16 EUR

  2. Looking monthly at the past 6 months, on average:

                                                               i.      71% of all delivery orders have an avg check > 20 EUR

                                                             ii.      26% have an avg check between 10 and 20 EUR

                                                           iii.      3% have an avg check < 10 EUR

  1. A higher avg check could be being incentivized through the free delivery campaign but nevertheless data shows that majority of the users will already benefit from a free service fee.

  2. Given the avg check of delivery in PLK ES is 25 EUR, new service fees buckets would need to be defined to get a more optimized solution from a financial standpoint.

  3. Amplitude chart for reference: https://app.eu.amplitude.com/analytics/rbiberia/chart/e-q93tmghy

image-20240126-130215.png